This report, by its very length, defends itself against the risk of being read.
An alternate version reads similarly, so I will have to see which is correct--assuming it's not one of those "attributed to" deals which can lead to rather surprising sources.
The other version:
The length of this document defends it well against the risk of its being read.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be reasonably civil. Ire alloyed with reason is fine. But slagging the host gets you the banhammer.