Emerging from my cave, I see the Dems are offering us Thurston/Ginger 2004.

Someone enlighten me: for candidate selection purposes, the difference between Dan Quayle and John Edwards is what, precisely?

We have two young, obscure pretty-boy one-term Senators with background, experience and legislative records that could charitably be described as "thin."

But for some reason, the media caned the former and is in the midst of an extended tongue bath for the latter.

I wonder....





...not at all.