Maybe, but don't break out the champagne flutes yet.
David Boulware, an infectious-disease physician-scientist at the University of Minnesota Medical School not involved in the research said the findings were “pretty impressive.” He noted the drug was most effective when given earlier, within three days of symptoms, but it remained highly effective even when given five days after symptoms appeared — which may better reflect the real world use of the drug.
“That’s great. That’s a huge impact,” Boulware said.
Two dampeners:
1. As mentioned in the article, peer-review is necessary.
2. As a gent who got a suddenly-necessary Pfizer booster two weeks ago yesterday, understand that I am not inclined to pop corks for Pfizer's more grandiose claims.
IF it is true, this is great and glorious news--a literal game-changing life-saver.
If so, it will turn corona into something more akin to the flu. Not to mention taking the steam out of the boiler of our society-straining vaccine wars.
But let's wait and see.
I wonder if this new amazing drug has anything in common with particular previous drugs...
ReplyDeleteNot that I have any strong opinions on it. Though admitting your agnostic on any particular COVID issue is enough to get one labeled a crazy right-wing anti-vaxxer. (And hey! I'm not anti-vax.)
I have been very tempted to record people's offhand comments for use in the future though.
I didn't realize that ivermectin was an anti-inflammatory. Given that other drugs with anti-inflammatory effects look promising, I can see why it might work.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/a-closer-look-at-the-new-fluvoxamine-trial-data-69369
And, yeah--if you want to record, go ahead. Things will probably look really interesting in another nine years or so.
ReplyDelete9? I'm betting it'll pay off in 2 - maybe 3. XD
Delete