Search This Blog

Thursday, March 28, 2013

The Archiving of Benedict.

Or, a defense of Pope Benedict XVI.

Be warned--I'm having a bad Lent. This post will display some of that.

I have passed my breaking point with the derogatory comparisons of Pope Francis with Pope Benedict. Even those that aren't intended as derogatory can be, by omission. "Pope Francis is so humble! He cares so much for the poor! He's celebrating Mass at a youth prison!" etc.

Fine. You know what? So did Benedict. All of them. How quickly we forget--or never bothered to notice in the first place. I understand the joy of a new pontiff, and trying to get to know someone who wasn't on any of our radars a month ago. I get that. But--if we don't modulate our reactions, we are, however unknowingly, feeding into a nasty narrative that seeks to pit the new Pope against the Emeritus.

And for some Catholics, the nasty motivation is clear. Behold this stink-bomblet, snarking at ermine and ring-kissing. Something tells me she snaps to in the courtroom (hint--she'd better). But the Pope can't throw her in jail, so she discerns that Christ wanted no earthly signs of respect apart from "How ya doin', Yer Popeship?"

"Anonymous commenters with garbled memories of catechism and glitter aren't representative," you might say. Fine.

How about ordained clerics? Consider this example from one of Roger "RICO" Mahony's (the disgraced Cardinal's own tweets merit no further discussion) ordinands, Deacon Eric Stoltz (no, not the guy from Pulp Fiction).



It was posted as a compare and contrast rebuke, obviously. More humility, less attention toward the cleric. Jay Anderson took a righteous swing at this bit of posturing on Facebook, and smacked it soundly.

While we're at it, Reverend: before leading the Humility Brigades into spiritual battle, you might want to tone down the number of references to yourself on the Saint Brendan's website . On the first page, there's a note that the website was designed by...Eric Stoltz! With a link to www.ericstoltz.com!

But wait--there's more! On the "Presider/Preacher [sic] Schedule page, there's a link to "Deacon Eric's Homilies"! Where you can e-mail Deacon Eric! And there's an "About The Deacon" Page (sorry, under construction)!

Do not despair, however: you can hop on over to the Photo Albums page and...eureka! A photo album dedicated to Deacon Eric's ordination nearly nine years ago--and it's the one with the largest number of files! Ah, that I must decrease and Him increase....

Irony: it's a mean bastard sometimes.

Moving on to less tempting targets...

 Unfortunately, I have to call a foul on First Things for this line:

What seems to be on the heart of Pope Francis—the Vicar of Christ and the pastor of the universal Church on earth—is a desire to move out from under a stifling, dull, and technical rubricism toward the Paschal light of Christ’s redemptive charitable love.

No. No. No. Ten thousand times, no. This is slander. Period. It may be inadvertent, but it is slander nonetheless. It indicates that the writer had no idea of what Benedict was saying or doing with the office of Pope and with the liturgy during his pontificate.

Look, Pope John Paul II was a unique, outsized figure in the history of the Papacy. He had a stage actor's ability to magnify his reach and effect. The odds of his successor replicating that charismatic effect were zero. So Benedict didn't try. Instead, he let the office speak more loudly through historical and liturgical symbolism than he ever could as a stage presence. If the previous papacy was Pope John Paul II, his successor was Pope Benedict XVI. As Amy Welborn brilliantly pointed out, it wasn't because Benedict was a vain monarchical clotheshorse, it was because he was a teacher in an office that was bigger than he was, and he was pointing to a profound historical reality embodied in the Papacy. Likewise, in the liturgy, rubrics were emphasized because it wasn't about the priest--even if he happened to be a Pope--but because the rubrics point to a greater, supernatural reality which is dependent upon God.

So, please, stop pitting RIGHT NOW against LAST MONTH, and engaging in what strongly hints at a washing of one's hands of the previous pontificate. The Body of Christ deserves better.

8 comments:

  1. Amy Welborn is a voice crying in the wilderness, though the Anchoress is showing some signs of sobering up after a 2-week binge. For the rest of the professional Catholics, like Mark Shea at Little Green Catholics, they've even given up their perfunctory "Of course I loved Benedict XVI but..." intros. Now they're digging in on the "winning" side. I think a good part of it is driven by hatred of traditionalists and a perception that those troublemakers have lost their protector and are now going to get what's coming to them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, thanks, but if I didn't hold myself back I'd be shrieking and pummeling idiots in the wilderness. So much more to say, and Dale, you said a lot of it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you, Amy!

    DM: Just a couple of clarifiers:

    1. I consider Mark a good friend. While I understand he inspires strong feelings on St. Blog's, this won't be a Bash Mark Zone.

    2. He linked to Amy's piece this week, so I don't think he can be fairly linked to the "Out With The Old!" mindset.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Little Green Catholics" - that is excellent! I'm tucking that away...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Totally agree, and I have also enjoyed Amy's and Joanna Bogle's fine takedown on this.

    First Benedict got the unfavorable comparison smackdown with jp2 when he became Pope and then gets it again when he steps down.

    Oh and as for Deacon Stolz, I find it rather ironic that the openly "gay" Deacon is against liturgical finery and lace! There goes that stereotype.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I've seen a fair amount of ugliness on both sides, both those using Francis to trash Benedict and Benedict to trash Francis. I've spent a fair amount of time in the weeks following the conclave talking to friends and acquaintances on both ides of the fence, trying to talk the liberal ones out of their unseemly triumhalism and the trads off the ledge. It's a reverse of the days following Benedict's election.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't know how I missed this post, Dale. I totally agree. I have been talking myself down from being angry enough to chew nails. Attention, Catholics, Francis is not a stick with which to beat Benedict, and vice versa.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree for once; the contrast of the two popes is an infantile game, but it's run its course.

    ReplyDelete